Posted Feb 2015
Scarborough Waterfront Project
Public meeting #2 update
Scarborough Waterfront Project Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) has initiated a study under the Environmental Assessment Act to create a system of public spaces along the Lake Ontario shoreline between Bluffer’s Park and East Point Park in Toronto, Ontario. The vision of the Scarborough Waterfront Project is a system of linked scenic landscapes along the water’s edge providing a safe and accessible waterfront experience with opportunities to actively enjoy the outdoors, to relax and reflect, and to learn about and appreciate the natural and cultural heritage of the bluffs.
Based on feedback received, Public Information Centre #2, originally scheduled for January, has been rescheduled for Tuesday, February 24, from 5:30 - 9:00 pm at Qssis Banquet Hall, 3474 Kingston Rd. The intent of PIC#2 is to provide the public, stakeholders and interested parties a meaningful opportunity to be part of the planning process.
To receive project updates and information please subscribe to the Scarborough Waterfront Project E-newsletter: http://trca.on.ca/swp
Outdoor Ice Rinks update
At the January 13th meeting of Scarborough Community Council, councillors recommended that the City of Toronto:
- Request Parks, Forestry and Recreation staff to assist in the creation of volunteer run outdoor rinks as an interim measure at the Thomson and MacGregor Parks.
- Request the Toronto School Boards to create skating rinks at a minimum of one school per ward.
Scarborough Community Council referred written submissions, including a deputation from CCRA, and the following recommendations to City staff for consideration in the preparation of their 20-year Facilities Master Plan:
1. That the Community Development and Recreation Committee develop a 10-year outdoor artificial ice rink strategy that would see approximately one or two artificial ice rinks built per year in Scarborough and North York with a goal of creating one additional ice rink per ward in North York and Scarborough.
2. That Parks, Forestry and Recreation staff report on the economic benefit of building one or two new four-pad hockey arenas with associated library, basketball, pool, and other community amenities in Scarborough and North York.
To read the complete Scarborough Community Council consideration, including background, recommendations and motions, visit http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2015.SC3.2
CCRA would like to thank those Centennial residents who gave voice to their concerns by assisting us in our deputation. The CCRA deputation can be read online. We also thank Scott Harrison, for his continuing efforts to advance this issue on behalf of Scarborough residents.
Posted Jan 2015
Toronto Ward Boundary Review
Toronto City Council has hired a group of consultants to conduct a Toronto Ward Boundary Review (“Draw the lines”) to look at the size and shape of Toronto's wards. The review was put in place because many wards, including wards in Scarborough, are significantly above or below the average ward population due to population growth or decline. Although our ward, Ward 44, is only slightly above the Toronto ward population average (1.4%), we are surrounded by wards with increasing or declining populations (Ward 41, 42 and 43). So, our ward boundary could change as the boundaries of neighbouring wards are adjusted.
The review is concluding its first round of public consultation. Consultants are holding public meetings and surveying residents on their opinions about the type of representation we would like to see.
Public meetings in Scarborough and Etobicoke/York already took place in early and mid-December. Meetings will take place in January 2014 in North York, Downtown Toronto and East York in January 2014. Details about the dates and locations of these meetings can be found at http://www.drawthelines.ca/meetingdates/.
You can also fill out an online survey at http://fluidsurveys.com/s/TWBRSurvey/.
Feedback received from consultations and surveys will inform the development of several options for structuring Toronto’s wards. Once options are developed, a second round of consultation will begin in May 2015. At that time, the public and stakeholders will have an opportunity to provide feedback on the proposed ward boundary options.
More information on timelines of the review can be found at http://www.drawthelines.ca/processtimeline/. The review is expected to produce a final report to Council for approval in Spring 2016. The new ward boundaries will be used for the October 2018 municipal election.
Residents can sign up to receive updates on the review at http://www.drawthelines.ca/mailing-list-sign-up.
Creek Biosolids Environmental Assessment
City Responses from PIC #1
Public Information Centre was held on June 16th at the Legion Hall on
Lawson Road. Those in attendance were invited to submit written questions
and comments to the City. The City has recently tabled two documents
outlining its responses (shown below in italics). The first
document, issued by the Project Consultant CIMA, deals with the questions
raised by the community attendees (16 pages), and the second, from the
City Project Manager, deals specifically with the comments submitted by
The Toronto Environmental Alliance (11 pages).
A summary of
these documents is presented below.
Comments and Questions
attendees signed in, and thirty written comment sheets were submitted. The
responses were prepared by the Project Team, and were grouped into ten
PIC format and Contents
There was some
support for a town hall type meeting rather than the poster session used
for PIC #1 – City will consider alternate formats for PIC #2 and PIC #3
to optimize the opportunities for group discussion.
Most attendees felt
the information was well presented, and there was support for the
inclusion of health aspects in the new EA.
Rationale for Class EA Study
Many attendees were
upset that the recommendation of the original EA was not implemented by
City Council, and were concerned about the extra cost of the new study –
staff indicated that, because of City Council’s rejection of the
Highland Creek recommendation, a new EA for Highland Creek was required,
so that the remaining parts of the Biosolids Master Plan for the other
City sewage plants could be implemented.
expressed that the City would choose a lower upfront-cost solution that
may not be the best in the long term; a few attendees were concerned that
Social impacts were being given priority over Health impacts – all
feasible options will be considered based on a combination of health,
environmental, social (community) and economic evaluation criteria; the
Class EA will consider Cumulative Air Emissions, Human Health Risks and
Health Impacts in the evaluation process.
Will the City use the
latest models to evaluate pollution emissions – the City will use the
Biosolids Evaluation Assessment Model (BEAM) for calculating greenhouse
gas emissions, and the CALPUFF model for cumulative air emissions
expressed the process will be hijacked by special interest groups from
outside the study area, and by politicians driven solely by ideology and
political opportunity - the City indicated that the consultation
process is transparent and all comments received, and the responses, will
be made public.
Health Impact Assessment (HIA)
Who will be members
of the HIA Stakeholder’s group and when will they meet – the first HIA
Stakeholder’s meeting was held on November 12th and was
attended by representatives from the NLC, the Centennial CRA, the
Coronation CA, the Highland Creek CA, the West Rouge CA, Toronto Public
Health, TDSB, TCDSB, the East Scarborough Boys and Girls Club, Local
Immigration Partnership, Toronto Region Conservation Authority, TEA, and
Open Policy Ontario and Metcalf Fellowship.
Timing for Implementation of
Selected Biosolids Management Solution
expressed that the proposed new facilities would be delayed by
modifications currently being made at the plant, and that the solution
would be dated before it is built – the timing of the implementation of
the recommended solution will be determined as part of the Class EA, and
the recommended replacement of the existing incineration equipment will be
undertaken in a timely manner, once the EA is completed; the existing
incinerators are tested and monitored regularly, and meet all regulatory
Biosolids Generation and
There was strong
support for the thermal destruction option with best available technology
and resource recovery, as it appears to have the best health,
environmental and financial outcomes – City will evaluate fluid bed
incineration, pyrolysis, gasification and other emerging thermal
expressed about the long term sustainability of the demand for processed
biosolids as fertilizer, which could then result in the biosolids ending
up in landfills – City acknowledges that there are a number of factors
affecting long–term reliability; a contingency plan will be developed for
all the alternatives.
There were some
questions about the reduction in the frequency of off-site trucking, if an
on-site biosolids processing plant is recommended – City will consider
the following on-site processes; drying (pelletizer), alkaline
stabilization, thermal hydrolysis, Lystek process, and composting, and the
related trucking requirements.
The City needs to
consider energy recovery options, such as co-generation – any processes
that have potential for energy recovery, through biogas or heat
generation, will be considered, along with ash recycling.
City should partner
with private industry to increase efficiencies – the City indicated a
willingness to partner with private industries for the off-site hauling
and processing of biosolids; in this case the ultimate end destination
would not be selected by the City.
Biosolids Transport Off-Site
There was much
opposition to trucking biosolids through the local communities, for
safety, as well as health and property value considerations, and airborne
contaminants from the trucks – if truck haulage is selected, the City
will specify measures to minimize noise, odours, traffic, and safety
related impacts; the operation of vehicles transporting biosolids is
regulated by Federal and Provincial legislation and City bylaws.
There were requests
to investigate other off-site transportation methods such as rail cars,
lake barges or pipelines – the EA will evaluate all modes of
transportation, and results will be presented in PIC #2
Land Application of Biosolids
or Processed Biosolids Products
Many concerns were
expressed about the Health Impacts due to the contamination of food, soil
and groundwater by spreading biosolids on farmland – City indicated
that the assessment of health risks would be limited to residents of Wards
43 and 44 only.
Many were concerned
about the long term impacts on human health by the spreading of biosolids
that contain complex chemicals that are not regulated in sludge, and heavy
metals on farm lands; biosolids should not be used as fertilizer on
Ontario croplands and beyond – the Province regulates the use of
biosolids as a fertilizer on land, through the Ministry of Environment and
Climate Change (MOECC) and the Ontario Ministry of Food and Rural Affairs
(OMAFRA); these agencies, along with other Canadian and US government and
academic institutions, have concluded that when practiced reasonably, and
in accordance with guidelines and regulations, agricultural land
application is beneficial, and poses minimal health or environmental risk;
evaluating the regulations governing the application of biosolids to
agricultural land is beyond the scope of the EA process.
Air Emission Impacts
The City needs to
consider the greenhouse gas emissions for the complete trucking
operations, not just to the 401, but to the final disposal destination –
the truck haulage greenhouse gas emissions will consider both the
minimum and maximum haul distances, but the health impacts outside the
community will not be considered.
Many were concerned
about the emissions from the existing incinerators – the emissions from
the existing incinerator will be modeled, along with the emissions from
all the feasible biosolids management options.
Environmental Alliance Comments and Questions
comments were predominantly focused on demonstrating that the PC #1 Poster
Board presentation was biased in favour of the incinerator upgrade that
was selected as the preferred option in the previous Biosolids Master
Plan. The City did not accept this position.
Meeting Notice for PIC #1 and
Inadequate notice of
PIC #1 was provided – City said that Notice of the Meeting was issued
on June 5, 2014 and was publicized in two editions of the Scarborough
Mirror; notices were also published on the Project website.
Requested that the
Technical Memoranda be posted on the website – City indicated that
Technical Memoranda will not be published on the website, however some
Technical Updates will be published on the website.
Format of Meeting
Requested that the
‘read and roam’ poster board format be changed for PIC #2 and PIC #3 to
include ‘question and answer’ sessions; this would allow more community
dialogue, and would ensure accountability and lack of bias from the
consultants – PIC #1 was only to provide information on the purpose of
the Class EA, and the approach and schedule; other formats will be
considered for PIC #2 and PIC #3, to ensure unbiased presentation of
information and receipt of feedback.
Poster Boards were Biased
Information on some
of the Poster Boards was confusing and biased – the information in PIC
#1 was intended as background for those less familiar with the wastewater
treatment process; technical information will be provided at later stages
in the process, as the options are developed
The EA Study
When will the City
Councillors and the Mayor vote on the final decision; does the current
Public Consultation process eliminate the need for a 30-day Review;
questioned the role of the Ministry of the Environment – once the Class
EA Study is completed, it will be presented for approval to the Public
Works and Infrastructure Committee, and then to City Council; the
construction of any recommendations resulting from the study will require
a modification to the MOE Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA); the ECA
also covers monitoring and compliance requirements; the Public
Consultation Process does not reduce or eliminate the 30-day mandatory
review period, or the submission of the final report for review by the
Minister of the Environment.
Long List of
It is indicated that
TM-2 will indicate the long list of options; how will the options be
selected and will the public have a chance to comment on the list –
information on the long list will be included in Newsletter #2, which is
scheduled for release in November; the short list will be presented in one
of the first Technical Updates.
Bias against Trucking
It was suggested that
some of the descriptions such as ‘risk of spills’ was biased against
trucking – the intent of the posters was to provide general information
on the project; a full list of impacts will be evaluated as part of the
Class EA process, and will be presented at future PICs.
Development of Short List
How will the four
decision-making categories (health, social (community), environment and
economic) be assessed in developing the short list; will both positive and
negative impacts be assessed; how will the scoring system work – the
short list of management options will be those determined to be feasible
for the Highland Creek Treatment Plant; the screening process will be
presented in a Technical Memorandum and at PIC #2; the evaluation criteria
are currently being developed.
(On-site Thermal Treatment of Biosolids)
The thermal treatment
title is misleading, as the poster does not include all types of thermal
processes; no mention of ash disposal – the Approach 1 category will
cover all potential thermal destruction processes; ash disposal, which in
2013 involved 64 truck loads, will be considered in the evaluation.
Approach 3 (On-site Processing and Off-site Transporting of Biosolids)
processing poster does not cover some of the advantages of this option,
including the reduced number of trucks – note that some on-site
processing options would increase the number of trucks compared to
Approach 2 (Off-site Transportation of Biosolids), because of the need to
import materials that could increase the volume of biosolids; other
options, such as on-site pelletization, could reduce the number of trucks.
A number of questions
were asked about the transportation study – the evaluation of preferred
routes and modes will become part of all options that involve the off-site
transport of biosolids.
Who will be included
in the HIA Stakeholders group – a broad range of organizations will be
asked to participate; one member from TEA will be invited.
Questions about the
methodology for the CAIA – a range of scenarios, considering wind
patterns, will be modeled to evaluate impacts.
Human Health Risk
Questions about the
HHIA, and who can attend the PICs – the HHRA is a quantitative
assessment of health impacts in the study area, and will feed into the HIA;
the PICs are open to anyone who would like to attend.
A number of
opportunities offered by the Approach 2 (Off-site Transportation of
Biosolids) option were mentioned – the City appreciated the
identification of these issues, and indicated that by utilizing the broad
expertise of the project team, and through public and stakeholder
consultation, all opportunities related to all the biosolids management
options will be evaluated.
summary is not intended to cover the questions, comments and responses in
complete detail. Interested readers should apply by email to Josie Franch,
the Project Public Consultation Coordinator, for the compete reports (firstname.lastname@example.org).
The next PIC
#2 meeting is scheduled for March 2015. It is critical that we get a
strong attendance by local residents, including the submission of written
comments, to ensure that the Community’s views are made known to the
prepared by Frank Moir,
Highland Creek Treatment Plant Neighbourhood Liaison Committee.
Notice of OMB Hearing of
Watson Farm (222 Centennial Rd. and 35 Acheson Blvd.)
The developer of the Watson
Farm (222 Centennial Rd. and 35 Acheson Blvd.) has appealed to OMB for
hearing, pursuant to sections 34(11) and 51(34) of the Planning Act. The
reasons for the appeal are:
1. The City has failed to make
a decision regarding the Zoning By-law Amendment application within 120
days after it was received;
2. The City has failed to make
a decision regarding the Draft Plan of Subdivision application within 180
days after it was received;
3. The proposed Zoning By-law
Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision would permit development on the
Subject Property which represents good land use planning, is appropriate
for the Subject Property and is in the public interest;
4. The proposed development on
the Subject Property will respect and reinforce the existing physical
character of the neighbourhood;
5. The Zoning By-law Amendment
application is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, 2014 and
conforms to the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe; and
6. Such further and other
reasons as counsel may provide and the Board will permit.
The hearing is scheduled on
Feb 4, 2015 at 10:00AM. The hearing location is:
Ontario Municipal Board
655 Bay Street, 16th Floor
Toronto ON M5G 1E5
Residents who are interested
in participant the hearing may write a letter to the following person to
register as a participant at the hearing (It is free). Individuals should
appear at the start time of the proceedings.
Case Number: PL140968
Raymond Borja, Case
Ontario Municipal Board 655
Bay Street Suite 1500 Toronto, Ontario M5G 1E5
Residents who have concerns
regarding the development are encouraged to contact the city stuff:
Katrien Darling, Senior
Planner City of Toronto, City Planning Division
Scarborough Civic Centre
150 Borough Drive, 3rd Floor
Toronto, ON M1P 4N7
Tel. 416.396.7721 Fax
If you take a drive up
Friendship Avenue you can usually hear the sound of children’s laughter as
they play in the playground hidden behind the trees next to the West Rouge
Plaza. The laughter that you are hearing would be coming from the over
175 children that are in the care of Charlottetown Boulevard Child Care
CBCC has been an integral
part of the West Rouge/West Hill Community for almost 30 years offering
childcare programs for children aged 18 months to 5 years of age, as well
as programming for school aged children 6 to 12 years old. They are the
only non-profit childcare centre a short commute from the GO Station that
offers childcare services and provides bus service to all schools within
the area. For working parents they provide a safe place to leave our
children while we are at work, but they are more than just that. If you
take a walk through the hallways and look into each of the open and airy
classrooms you will definitely run into some familiar faces because a
number of CBCC staff are also members of the Community – our neighbours,
customers and friends. At times, retired staff from the centre also
return as volunteers.
have been undergoing a number of changes in recent years with the roll out
of all-day kindergarten. Organizations such as CBCC have had to learn how
to adapt and change. This includes offering additional programs such as a
half day nursery program for those stay at home parents that want an
opportunity to slowly integrate their children into a structured program.
The centre’s Director
has been part of CBCC for over 25 years, and has been a witness to
many changes in the community. In recent years the demographics in the
area have been changing, with an influx of new families to this area of
the city that provides such a great location to raise a family.
But change also poses
challenges, as every open space or older structure provides an opportunity
for housing development, and West Rouge Plaza is no exception. The Centre
confirms that there are no defined plans for development of the West Rouge
Plaza at this time and the Centre does have a lease on the location that
continues to be renewed. Even so, given the recent changes in the
community such as the Island Road development, all members of the West
Rouge/West Hill community should be asking their local candidates for
councillor and trustees: “How will you ensure that we maintain the
childcare services that are so important to working families and our
Looking back at Centennial
Posted Nov 2014
Centennial Community was a lot different during Louise Boyden’s
upbringing. The waterfront could be seen from the Centennial Road School
and the Johns-Manville Plant was fully functional. Boyden attended
Centennial Road School and remembers it much differently than what it is
“When I first went to Centennial, you could see the lake from Centennial
Road School. There were no houses or anything [in the way],” she said.
Louise Boyden is an English teacher and head of the English department at
Sir Oliver Mowat. She was raised in the Centennial community and attended
Centennial Road School, where the students were split into four houses in
accordance with the four original settlers of the community: Adams,
Brumwell, Miller, and Tredvalley.
had inter-house competitions and just like in Harry Potter at the end of
the year the house that got the most points got a prize,” Boyden said.
tradition is what is now referred to as house leagues, due to the
different houses competing for a prize.
When the Johns-Manville plant, now a townhouse complex near the
waterfront, was open, Boyden and many other children would collect the
by-product which was balls of glass referred to as alleys.
“All the children would go down to the waterfront and we’d pick up what
were like alleys, and collect alleys,” she said.
What has kept Louise Boyden drawn to the Centennial community is the
natural scenery. Being close to the lake and being surrounded by parks,
she continues to enjoy the greenery.
have places where you can go and forget you’re in a city. You can be
outside and think that you’re in a nature reserve,” Boyden said.
This is the first article in an
occasional series by Matthew Chin, a graduate of Sir Oliver Mowat C. I.
and journalism student at Ryerson University. Matthew will be writing
about and uncovering our local stories.
Treatment Plant Update
by the Highland Creek
Treatment Plant Neighbourhood Liaison Committee
Because there were most
likely only 100-150 people who attended the Monday, June 16th initial
Public Information Centre presentation by the consultants regarding the
Biosolids Environmental Assessment for the Highland Creek Sewage Treatment
Plant, we thought it important to have a follow-up article discussing the
next steps in the process.
What are biosolids?
Biosolids, or sludge, is the highly odorous solid-liquid material left
after the treatment of sewage. It contains active pathogens, nutrients
such as nitrogen and phosphorus heavy metals, various industrial
chemicals, pharmaceutically active compounds and other emerging substances
of concern. It is not just human waste. It is 25% solid and 75% water.
It should be noted that
the Environmental Assessment, which started on April 1, 2014, has now
identified three possible general approaches for the management of the
biosolids at the Highland Creek Sewage Treatment Plant.
Two of the three
solutions would involve the daily trucking of biosolids through the
neighborhood to the 401, a distance of seven (7) kilometres through
residential and busy commercial areas.
The third alternative is
to upgrade the present on-site thermal reduction system to the next level
of efficiency. Fluidized Bed Thermal Reduction (one possible choice) with
state-of-the-art air emission controls, is a system that would dispose of
the sewage sludge on site. This is a system that would not require the
addition of oil or gas to maintain the combustion process. In fact the
process byproducts, namely excess heat and ash, could provide
opportunities for energy and resource recovery/reuse.
In September the first of
two Health Impact Assessment Stakeholder meetings will be held. The Health
Impact Assessment is a procedure used to identify how a specific project
could potentially affect health in the affected human populations.
For this study, the HIA
will use the following key sources of information to evaluate health
impacts from the different sewage sludge management options:
A. Cumulative Air
B. Human Health Risk
Assessment, which will evaluate the potential for health impacts from
C. Noise Assessment
D. Odour Assessment
E. Traffic Assessment
F. Other health
related impacts, as identified through the HIA Stakeholders Group that
represents the community, city and subject experts.
Project Newsletter #2
will be issued in November 2014. The second PIC open house for the
Environmental Assessment will most likely be held in February 2015. The
exact time and date should be available for the next issue of our
For further information
on the EA Communications and Consultation Plan, please refer to the
project website at:
To be added to the
project information mailing list, send an email to:
would like to receive news and updates from the Highland Creek Treatment
Plant Neighbourhood Liaison Committee, email
and request to the added to the HCTP email list.
BUILDING SOMETHING, by
There’s a place in
the wilderness of the northern lowlands, a paradise dotted by black spruce
and poplar, tamarack and ash, the earth woven with rivers and pocked by
muskeg. It’s true bush, about 220 kilometers north of Cochrane, Ontario,
and about 90 kilometers south of Moosonee and its northern reserve cousin,
In recent years,
these communities, and others very similar to them right across Canada’s
north, have been devastated by waves of young people taking their own
lives. There are the theories: brutal socio-economic conditions,
psycho-biological tendencies, the post-traumatic stress of a culture’s
destruction. Ultimately, though, no one is quite sure why the rate is
often 100 times higher than the Canadian average. All we know is that
something desperately needs to be done.
So we’re doing
something. We are building a camp for kids there, where the Abitibi River
meets another, much smaller river, the camp’s namesake, the Onakawana.
We are working hard
to change despair into self-reliance, of changing that frightening feeling
of being lost into always knowing how to find home, of changing the belief
that there isn’t much of a future into seeing that the world is your
oyster, or should I say, your netted sturgeon, your beaded moccasin, your
moose tenderloin, your sweat lodge, your eagle feather, your round dance
in the wilderness, surrounded by your friends.
And what makes me
especially happy is that this camp, Onakawana, won’t be the only one.
It’s just the first in what will be camps for youth across Canada, where
young people can get to learn and get to share, maybe get to find
themselves a little bit. It’s a place where they are encouraged to simply
JOSEPH BOYDEN, AWARD-WINNING AUTHOR OF
TO SPEAK AT WEST HILL UNITED CHURCH
Joseph Boyden, author
of “The Orenda” and winner of Canada Reads for 2014 will be the guest
speaker on Wednesday September 24th, 2014 at 7:30 p.m. at West
Hill United Church, 62 Orchard Pk. Drive at Kingston Road, Scarborough, On
M1E 3T7. This is a benefit for Camp Onakawana, a camp for kids in the
far north, which is dear to Mr. Boyden’s heart. A ‘meet and greet’ with
the author and book signing will follow with light refreshments. Tickets
are $20.00, in advance, from the church. Make cheques payable to: West
Hill United Church.
For more information call 416-282-8566.
First Nations Study Group at West Hill United Church has been meeting for
over 3 years. Through our group studies, the heartbreak of the ongoing
tragedy of the suicides and attempted suicides amongst young people on
reserves has been painfully brought home to us. This subject is very
close to author, Joseph Boyden’s heart. He and his close friends are
striving to make a difference in the lives of the young people in the far
north, changing despair into self-reliance. We hope that you will be able
to join us on September 24th, to help make a difference, too!
Posted June 2014
On May 10, CCRA Past President Ben Stanton passed away peacefully at
Centenary Hospital in his 93rd year with his family at his side. Ben was
born in Dutchess, Alberta, the eldest son of 13 children to Mervin and
Blanche Stanton. Ben was a cowboy as a young man on the Dorthy Cattle Co.
Ranch, Bar U Ranch & The Circle Ranch. He joined the Canadian Air Force -
heading east where he met his beautiful bride Margarette. They settled in
the Centennial community in 1948, where they still resided in the family
home he had built. Ben enjoyed working with friends he made during his
involvement in the CCRA. He was influential in creating several landmarks,
the gates at Adams Park in the Centennial year and building homes on Ben
CCRA extends sincere condolences to the Stanton family. With warm
memories, to follow is an article written by Ben Stanton in 2009 during
CCRA’s 60th anniversary year.
60+ Years of Memories
by Ben Stanton, CCRA Past President
In April 1948, my wife Margarette and I came out with a real estate
salesman to look over an acre of land on the east side of Centennial Road,
four lots north of Lawson Road “very late in the evening”.
It was too dark to survey the property, so we came out the next day on the
bus to Highland Creek and walked along Lawson Road, a sandy trail, to
Centennial Road (both were paved later to service the new John’s Manville
plant at Prot Union and Lawrence Avenue. At that time the Scarborough’s
border was the west side of Port union Road and later extended to the
The CCRA was being formed so we purchased our first memberships from Tom
McMorrow at his little store just west of the present strip plaza at the
corner of Lawson and Centennial Roads.
We built our home and occupied it in October 1949 through the “Veteran’s
Land Act Plan” and have raised a daughter and two sons who live near and
We attended the first community picnic held by the CCA later the CCRA at
the original little school house located at the north side of Adams Park
where the Ontario Department of Highways excavated fill materials to form
the 2A and 401 connections. This is how the present ball diamond and
soccer field were formed.
1960 – 1963
As President the first time, I had many meetings with Bill Brown and Jack
Kay of Scarborough Township, Park Department to encourage the development
of Adams Park. This was a more difficult task because it is a district
park not community park. However, a concession building for hydro and
water service was built and flood lighting on the toboggan hill, baseball
diamond and soccer field, previously mentioned, boards for an ice rink on
the Lawson Road side, flooding the rink etc. were completed by the CCRA.
As President for the second time, I had knowledge and personal dealings
with “Hands Fireworks” located in Cooksville, Ontario. What better way to
celebrate Centennial year than by having a May 24th weekend
with a fire work’s display.
Hands put on a “super display” at Adams Park and everyone had a great
time. This event was held for many years and, unfortunately, was
As President during our Centennial Year, one of my goals was to have stone
gates built at the Lawson Road entrance to Adams Park. We raised funds in
various ways, i.e., bottle drives (amazing how many beer bottles were
cleared out of sheds). All were turned in for cash at the beer store. We
held Broom Sales and sold hundreds of regular corn brooms and stiff
bristled push brooms.
McCowan Readymix supplied the concrete for the foundations, free of
charge, many building trades made cash donations along with many
The Masonry contractor did the work at a reasonable cost. The hand
digging for the foundations was done by a few of the CCRA members.
Consumer Gas supplied the gas lamps and the connections to the lamps. At
the dedication, Mayor Albert Campbell said, “Let there be light” and the
gas company employees turned them on. Unfortunately, vandals ruined them
not long after and they were removed. Generally the youth in this area
were very helpful in all the events performed by the CCRA and we believe
these vandals were from outside of our community.
It has been a pleasure to put this bit of history together and before I
close, I would like to thank you for the great Past President’s Dinner and
Dance that my wife and I attended – we thoroughly enjoyed the evening.
Celebrating local heroes:
Moving to Centennial almost 45 years ago, Tony Sibley remembers “a muddy
experience”, coming to this neighbourhood at a time when Lawrence Avenue
did not yet cross Highland Creek. He recalls wife June losing her shoes in
the mud during those early days, “but she wouldn’t have it any other way”.
Tony retired in 1992 after a satisfying career as a military engineer.
Reading at Port Union Library one day, Tony says he “looked up and
realized that there was a health club and other things happening” in the
community centre. Tony attended an Annual General Meeting of the Port
Union Seniors, and upon hearing that they needed a President, stepped up
to volunteer for a two-year term. Tony and June remained active in the
group for many years, enjoying community involvement and causes supported
by the always energetic Port Union Seniors.
In 2002, Tony joined the CCRA executive as Treasurer, a position he held
until this year, as well as serving an interim term as Membership Chair.
His steadfast commitment since joining CCRA has seen it through many vital
initiatives, events and issues in this community. Tony is particularly
proud of CCRA’s part in demanding cleanup at the Port Union site of the
asbestos-ridden Johns Manville plant, and the successful demand for
warning clauses that were added to new home agreements there.
After years of volunteering, Tony feels that Centennial’s growing pains
and changes are for the best. He is ready to move on to another good
neighbourhood, and says “times change and you have to change with it”.
After almost 45 years, Tony Sibley leaves our Centennial community a
better place. His steady hand at CCRA and Port Union Seniors were, and
still are, valued in our neighbourhood.
For readers of CCRA News, Tony’s keen editorial eye and mind will
be greatly missed. We wish him nothing but smooth, mud-free roads ahead.
“Several years ago
I was the Membership Chair for the CCRA. There were a lot of canvassers
required to the do the job and it was a lot of work. At the end of the
four years, I decided to try to find someone to take on the job as I was
running out of friends to help. As luck would have it for me, I was
chatting with Tony and when I told him that I was giving up the position,
he told me that he would do it.
I have always felt
that day was my lucky CCRA day. Tony went on to be a great Membership
Chair and the Treasurer as well. I will miss you, Tony.”-
Vice President CCRA
Celebrating local heroes:
Rella Braithwaite and her family celebrated her 91st birthday this year,
and a lifetime of giving to her community.
Rella and her husband Bob, a World War 2 veteran, settled in Centennial in
1946. She remembers early years here when neighbours shared a telephone
and washing machine. Rella speaks warmly of friends like the McMorrow,
Watson and Dempsey families, who were also among the first in the
Centennial Road Public School was still being built, and Rella’s six
children were able to attend there from grades one to eight. Rella became
involved with the school’s Home and School Association, later receiving a
Lifetime Achievement Award after her involvement for over 25 years.
She recalls being present in 1949 at the Home and School Association when
it was decided that Centennial School should have a recreation centre.
This led to the founding of the Centennial Community Recreation
Association. William Dempsey was made founding President. Rella feels that
the CCRA can be proud to be in their 65th year and she was pleased to
receive her CCRA recognition medal in 1977.
The Braithwaite family attended Centennial United Church and for a time,
Bob Braithwaite sang in the choir. As her children grew, Rella became more
active in the community. She attended Scarborough Board of Education
meetings for five years, and wrote a column entitled “Scarborough Board
Happenings” for West Hill News.
Notably, Rella is one of the eldest descendants of the Queen’s Bush
Pioneers, one of the largest Black settlements where fugitives escaping
slavery made new homes in Canada. Realizing that Black youth needed to
understand their heritage, she began researching and writing about early
Black settlers. In the 1960s, Rella wrote a column for Contrast
newspaper, sharing Black history with Toronto. She has since co-authored
several books including Some Black Women and Some Black Men
that profile outstanding figures in Canadian Black history.
Always sharing her research with students and adults, in 1975 Premier
William Davis appointed Rella to serve on an Advisory Council of
Multiculturalism. Years later, she received a Bi-Centennial Civic Award
from Scarborough Mayor Frank Faubert. Among her many honours, Rella has
received awards from Who’s Who in Black Canada, Congress of Black Women,
Association of Black Women and Negro Colour Guard.
Centennial has been home for over 67 years to this remarkable woman, who
says that it “has been a really great community since we came in 1946”.
Rella continues to inspire students with an annual writing award at
Centennial Road Public School. Never without a project, she is currently
working on a book about her sister the Reverend Addie Aylestock, first
Black woman minister in Canada.
There is always another story to be told – we wait for
Rella to write her own. It may be the best yet
Posted Mar 2014
What’s Happening at the West Rouge Tennis Club
(by Mary Soye,
Secretary, West Rouge Tennis Club)
you ever driven by the West Rouge Community Centre between April and
October and wondered what was happening under the bright lights of the
tennis courts in the evenings? Well this is the West Rouge Tennis Club – a
dynamic, community-based club, and home to people who love playing tennis
in the great outdoors.
evenings you will see the ladies’
and men’s house league doubles matches.
Wednesday evenings we have mixed doubles on the courts. Many Tuesday
nights you will see some of our more experienced players hosting other
Scarborough teams in a league that is part of the Scarborough Tennis
Federation (STF). West Rouge has
three different levels of teams in this league – some
more competitive than others! And you might just see us playing in the
Mixed Luck of the Draw tournament, a fun annual event that sparks some
spirited tennis. But
the real competition takes place later in the season at the club
let the competition scare you off, though. The club also offers
run by our pro for adult
non-members (beginner members are also
encouraged to attend) on Wednesday evenings from 6:00 to 7:00 in May and
June. Here you can learn (or re-learn) the basics. You are sure to meet up
with other players at your level and you can arrange games with them.
junior program is a great way for children under the age of 18 to get
involved in tennis – a sport that incorporates both mental and physical
exercise. From May 2 to May 31, all juniors have five free lessons with
our club pro on Saturdays and there are five organized junior drop-in
session on Wednesday afternoons in May and June from 5:00 to 6:00. We’d
like to see more juniors on our courts learning to love the game and play
it throughout their lives, and who knows? Your child might be the next
Milos or Eugenie! Find out by signing them up. And consider signing up
with them. Tennis is a great way to spend healthy, active family time,
right here in the neighbourhood.
addition to court time, the club hosts a number of social events
throughout the season, including an opening day barbeque, a Family Day
event, a mid-winter wine and cheese evening, an Ironman/Ironwoman
challenge that involves golf, tennis and a barbeque, and to round off the
season, a house league dinner and awards night.
have to be a member to play on our courts (except Saturday and Sunday
afternoons between 4:00 and 6:00when they are open to the public and at
the Wednesday beginner clinics),
so sign up now! You can find the application form
online at www. westrougetennisclub.com
and at the WRCC reception desk. We would love to
have you and your family join us at the West Rouge Tennis Club!
Posted Sept 2013 2013
As reported in June, the Highland
Creek Heritage Day held on Saturday June 8th, was combined with
U of T’s 100th anniversary celebration at the Miller Lash
House. This house is located on U of T Scarborough campus property off
Old Kingston Road adjacent to Colonel Danforth Park. Each Thursday
evening during the summer a pub night was held at the Miller Lash House.
The last night was Thursday August 15th. This was a new
venture for U of T. The location of the house is unique and the setting
is spectacular. Food was reasonably priced and good. From reports I
understand U of T will be opening up the house next summer with perhaps
more nights available. Watch for an announcement next spring.